11.
But why change the Liturgy?
I think it
is safe to say that the Liturgical reforms carried out since Vatican II was
probably more than what the council intended. The favoring of a possible change
to the vernacular (while keeping the Latin in the Church) was already hinted by
Pope Pius XII. So it would seem natural that the Church found the translation
to the vernacular a compromise that she could make in some cases. However, the council documents themselves
indicated that the Latin must be preserved (Sacrosanctum Concilium) since
it is the official language of the Latin rite Church.
Tridentine Mass |
12.
So why didn’t the Church revert back
to the Old mass once it was clear that the Church had strayed too far from the
intentions of the council?
Perhaps it
is because the Church saw the reversion back to the old mass will be seen by
the world as the Church returning to what it considers the unacceptable older
version of the Church. It is quite likely that the older form of the mass will
be reestablished if and when the Church is given her rightful place again in
society. Even today, the old mass is to coexist alongside the new mass
according to the decrees in Summorum
Pontificum.
13.
So we will see the rise of the
traditional practices again in the Church at some future time?
I believe
so. The traditional values of the Church were formed to support a Catholic way
of living over 2000 years. The more Catholic the world tends to become, the
more it will find the traditional values naturally attractive. This is probably
why we see some converts to the Catholic faith join traditionalist groups
within a short time in the Church.
14.
But this seems to be an incorrect
claim considering the Popes have made it clear that Vatican II is here to stay?
Vatican II
does not condemn traditions of the Church. Vatican II is certainly here to stay
in the sense that it will always be the Council that adjusted the Church to
continue in a world that had become hostile to her and stripped her of the
authority and position that she rightly held. But apart from the explicit
doctrine which cannot obviously contradict the doctrine already present in
Sacred Tradition, rest of Vatican II is a pastoral compromise to reach out to
the world in a period where the Church has been stripped of her rightful
position in society. Therefore, that aspect of Vatican II must pass away when
the Church is restored to her full glory while the teachings will remain.
15.
So is everything going according to
plan in the Church then?
As hinted
above, I think the answer is no. There are those who have incorrectly
understood Vatican II to be a break with sacred tradition. One part of this
group has left the Church and continues asking for the rejection of Vatican II.
The other part inside the Church has spread havoc. They have invented theological
concepts such as “Anonymous Christian” and a concept of God’s mercy that would
make it seem impossible for God to punish any person for any sin. All such
things have led to a weakening of the faith.
Some
irresponsible ecumenical activities involving faithful who do not even have an
understanding of the motive for such events has led to indifferentism inside
the Church. Many tend to see all faiths as good and equally capable paths to
salvation. That is not a good thing.
Traditional
values have been all but abandoned, for the Church tends to not mention them.
The lack of values such as modesty and other traditional values guiding
relationships between men and women have led to an increase in sexual sin
within the Church. Hostility toward traditional wisdom has also led men and
women to marry outside the faith and an increase in broken or undesirable
marriages. Divorce rates among Catholic is climbing. There are children growing
up in Catholic families without receiving the faith from their parents.
The Catholic
faith also tends to get portrayed as a temporal tool. Perhaps with an idea that
it will make it easier to spread the gospel, some tend to emphasize temporal
benefits of Christianity rather than accepting it because it is the truth. This
may include the mention of factors like more happiness and joy, higher life
expectancy, higher income levels, loving community, and other sorts of temporal
benefits that are said to correlate with Christianity. These persons tend to
forget the truth that in times of persecution, being a Christian meant
embracing a life of sorrow and a drastic reduction in life expectancy. The joy
of Christianity is also a joy different from what the world tends to identify
by that term. The true joy in Christianity comes from knowing the truth and
surrendering to the will of God. So it is more intellectual than emotional as
well. Overall, while mention of such temporal benefits can certainly draw
followers, work must be done to dispel their misunderstandings. If not, they
could soon leave the faith for not receiving what they mistakenly thought they
should receive as a Christian. Worse, they will spread the same misguided view
of Christianity making it seem like a temporal enterprise to be changed and
manipulated for maximizing these temporal ends.
16.
What is our duty then in these times?
I believe
our duty is to pray for the conversion of the world to Catholicism. We must
also pray for our Pope and Church leaders to guide our Church wisely and
prudently in these troubled times. Apart from prayers, we should try our best
at the individual level to convert those whom we meet to the faith, charitably
correct fellow Catholics who have a misguided view of Vatican II and the Church
teachings, and preserve the great traditions of the Church in our communities
and within our families.
In the words
of St. John the Bosco, “May we dare hope
to see peace in the world and the Church's triumph before the end of our lives?
We could then sing our Nunc dimittis. However, may God's will be done in all
things. The triumph of the Church is certain; if we do not see it here below,
we shall witness it, I hope from heaven.”
***
No comments:
Post a Comment